Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

A 3-D rendering of the proposed Suffolk Downs casino, now planned for Revere with partner Mohegan Sun (Image: Wendy Maeda/Boston Globe)

They state the house always wins, and appropriate now, prospective casino operators Suffolk Downs and Mohegan Sun are surely on a winning streak in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission unanimously authorized a waiver to the standing deadline for operators to file applications including certified referendum results from their host communities by the end of the season.

Year more Time, Next

That December 31 deadline was likely to be a problem that is real the Suffolk Downs casino proposal. While the gaming commission ended up being willing to enable the race track and partner Mohegan Sun the possibility to build a casino solely on land in the town of Revere, winner casino bonus code no deposit it consented that the original vote taken earlier this present year was for a considerably various proposition. As such, a new vote was needed one which would not have the ability to be held ahead of the year-end deadline.

Your choice was one that the panel said they made in an attempt to be since fair as possible to all sides. On November 5, both East Boston and Revere voted on whether to accept a Suffolk Downs casino that would have been primarily and almost entirely located on the Boston side of the edge between your two communities. East Boston residents voted against that proposition, while Revere voters overwhelmingly approved it.

That left plenty of outstanding questions that are legal the absolute most essential of which was whether Suffolk Downs could now create a casino entirely on land in Revere, which had approved a casino. The decisions since then have essentially stated that the clear answer is ‘yes’ but that it’ll be treated as being a unique project that must be re-approved, separately from the previous proposal.

‘We have wrestled hard with trying to figure out how to reconcile the ‘no’ vote in East Boston with all the ‘yes’ vote in Revere, and there’s no perfect solution,’ said Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby.

The waiver was the closest to that ‘perfect solution’ that the commission could come up with, thinking about the deadline that is tight. Mohegan Sun must still file their application as a potential operator by the conclusion of 2013, however a second referendum in Revere will just take spot sometime within the next 90 days after the deadline that is original.

Boston Fires Back

Boston officials opposed the waiver, saying that the vote in East Boston should be ‘respected and maintained’ in a letter to the payment. In addition, incoming Boston Mayor-elect Martin Walsh has said that he’s gotn’t yet ruled out of the possibility of taking legal action against this second casino proposition in Revere.

But Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has expressed confidence that the residents of his city will not just get to vote on the casino that is new, but that they’ll back it utilizing the same kind of support they did initial time around. On 5, 61 percent of Revere voters agreed to endorse the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, though it’s not clear if that support will increase or fall now that the casino will actually be in Revere november.

Should the new proposal gain approval from voters and regulators, it will end up being the second project to compete for the one available eastern Massachusetts casino license. The other casino proposal for the reason that area is situated in Everett, and would be operated by Wynn Resorts. That project just passed the suitability quotient regarding the gaming payment’s investigations.

Polish Computer Programmers Sentenced for Cyber Blackmail Threats

They might look happy and carefree here, but Polish computer coders Patryk Surmacki, 35 (left) and Piotr Smirnow, 31 (right) meant no good when they authorized cyber attacks on two casino sites (Image: Cavendish Press)

Two Polish computer programmers who attempted to blackmail two major unnamed on-line casino sites one in the united kingdom and one in the us have now been sentenced to prison, after a police sting nabbed the pair earlier this year.

False Pretenses

Piotr Smirnow, 31, and Patryk Surmacki, 35, approached the master of the UK site and requested a gathering. The victim who has A internet that is manchester-based casino met the pair under the knowing that Smirnow had a business proposition for him. The pair had been known by him for four years prior to the proposed business meeting, according to police reports.

But things took an unsightly change when, during the meeting which took spot at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5 the computer coders demanded a 50 per cent share for the man’s business and threatened to take the casino site down’s servers if he declined.

The set told the dog owner that they knew a notorious computer hacker by the name of ‘Wapo’ in the U.S., who they claimed would carry the cyber-attack out on the company’s servers if the pair paid him to do so, therefore stopping the operations of the company.

Understood as being a ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS), the court was told that the assault is with the capacity of decreasing also the most advanced of websites by overwhelming them via a mass attack of the company’s computer servers.

Cyber Hacker Paid

As the business owner declined to hand over 50 per cent of his company, Smirnow and Surmacki performed their threat on August 2nd and paid the cloaked American hacker £12,000 ($19,700) to complete their dirty work. The Manchester-based site went straight down for five hours, costing the business enterprise £15,000 ($24,558) when no customers could access your website during that time.

The victim had already alerted Manchester police to the duo’s hazard, nevertheless, and another meeting was set up in a hotel that is bugged next to Heathrow Airport on August 7th.

Whenever the dog owner of the business told the pair that he would not cooperate with them, they told him they had been ‘going to war’ and were then arrested by police who were on standby.

Smirnow also admitted around anymore,’ leading Detective Inspector Mossop to the comprehending that the research had removed an ’emerging global cyber hazard. that he had performed a similar attack for an US victim through a Skype call, during which he stated they had ‘enough power so individuals can’t try to push us’ This time the victim had been a U.S.-based gaming platform that allows 100 casino sites worldwide.

As for the U.S. webmasters, they obviously dodged a bullet.

‘This case made me worry for my safety that is personal well as money for hard times of my business. Which is why I felt compelled to do this against the perpetrators,’ stated who owns the Manchester-based casino site, which is believed to be worth £30 million ($49,143,000). It is calculated that a week-long assault on e-commerce would have cost the site owner a $600,000 loss, according to court reports.

‘No one should have to succumb to blackmail and also this sentence should become a warning to those involved in cyber extortion that the police and the courts will view this type of conduct very really,’ the site owner added.

Smirnow and Surmacki later pleaded accountable to two charges of blackmail and unauthorized functions on computers, and had been sentenced to 5 years and four months each by Judge Michael Henshaw at the Manchester court. Their own defense team described their attempted blackmail as ‘bizarre, misconceived, naïve and brazen.’

‘They used their intimate, expert knowledge of online business to bully the victims into submission,’ revealed Detective Inspector Chris Mossop of this Serious Organised Crime Division. ‘ But make no blunder, they may happen making use of the latest technology, but this ended up being simply good old-fashioned blackmail.’

Affinity Gaming Hit with Target-Style Security Breach

Nevada and casino that is regional Affinity Gaming happens to be hit by having a credit and debit card safety breach.

It is not been a good week for the industry that supposedly safeguards our credit and debit card transactions. Simply days after a national scandal that pulled in the Secret Service to investigate a huge system hack at popular retailer Target a breach that may end in fake charges, identity theft, or worse Las Vegas-based casino business Affinity Gaming appears to have been hit having a fiasco that is similar.

Credit-Processing Systems Compromised

Affinity announced that their credit and debit-processing systems had been hacked by the weekend’s begin, and were telling their clients most close that is likely 300,000 of who may have been hit by the hacking to watch their credit info as well as any unauthorized charges to their accounts.

Just what everyone wants to worry about after blowing their holiday bankroll, right?

But wait, it gets worse. While Target’s breach spanned about five months from around Thanksgiving to per week before Christmas Affinity states theirs hit all 12 of their properties in four U.S. states, and that the breach continued unabated from March 14 of this year all the way right through to October 16: that’s seven months. Contained in the properties affected were the business’s popular Nevada stateline gambling enterprises, including Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s, and Primm Valley Resort and Casino.

According to outside legal counsel for Affinity, James Prendergast, the cyber-hack had been from a ‘very sophisticated piece of malware that got right into a terrible location. It got contained and eliminated and we called in third-party forensic investigators for confirmation it was gone,’ Prendergast noted.

No chance to understand Who Got Hit

Adding to the confusion, because Affinity doesn’t store any consumer charge card information in their databases, they do not have way of knowing or notifying who might have been afflicted with cyberspace theft. However with casinos scattered throughout Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and Iowa, it most likely could influence a consumer that is nearly nationwide, particularly as several gambling enterprises come in or near vegas.

And in the event that you took place to pump gasoline at Affinity’s Primm Center petrol facility a significant stopping point at Nevada’s stateline into California you might maintain difficulty, because that company’s credit and debit processing systems were additionally hacked, starting on an as-yet-undetermined date and ending on November 29.

Therefore far, the only way Affinity has been able to notify customers of any possible problems happens to be on their own website with a ‘public notice of information protection event,’ but needless to say, many and also require been hit will not ever see that.

While hacking of this range can fall underneath the purview for the Secret Service and the FBI, both of whom happen notified, it undoubtedly gets the interest of state regulatory agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board. GCB Chairman A.G. Burnett says his company let the Nevada Gaming Commission know of the presssing issues immediately.

‘The company promptly notified us of what happened,’ Burnett explained. ‘They are working together with us closely.’

This incident may cause and has now founded a confidential, toll-free inquiry line to help its customers. as for Affinity, aside from their site notice and media attention, they don’t have a whole lot of means to allow customers know what is occurred or what to do about any of it, but in a statement said that ‘Affinity regrets any inconvenience’

That line, if you think you may are impacted, is open from 8 am to 6 pm Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays. The quantity to phone for U.S. or Canadian residents is 877-238-2179; all other international residents should call Affinity at +1-814-201-3696.

‘Affinity is cooperating into the law that is ongoing investigation regarding the incident,’ a company statement read. ‘Affinity has additionally taken a number of measures to strengthen the security of our system and contains caused legal and security vulnerability experts to aid identify and implement additional appropriate safeguards.’